New Hampshire Ports Director Faces Criminal Charges Amid Scandal
Port Director’s Allegations Spark Legal Battles
In a developing legal saga, Geno Marconi, the former Ports Director of New Hampshire, is fighting criminal charges related to allegations of mishandling confidential motor vehicle records. Marconi’s lawyer, Richard Samdperil, is pushing for the dismissal of the case, asserting that no crime was committed during Marconi’s professional duties.
Key Allegations
Prosecutors allege that Marconi improperly shared confidential motor vehicle records belonging to an individual identified as N.L. with Bradley Cook, the former Chair of the Division of Ports and Harbors Advisory Council. The charges also include accusations of Marconi deleting a voicemail after becoming aware of the ongoing investigation. N.L. is believed to be Neil Levesque, the vice chair of the Pease Development Authority, with whom Marconi reportedly had disputes over management at Rye Harbor.
In court filings, Marconi contends that he never disclosed sensitive information but instead received copies of N.L.’s vehicle registrations as part of a permit application. According to Samdperil, Marconi’s role required him to oversee the daily functions of port operations, thereby justifying any interactions with council members regarding such documents.
Legal Maneuverings
The defense argues that council members like Cook are permitted to access records pertinent to port matters, challenging the prosecution’s assertion that Marconi acted unlawfully. Samdperil emphasizes that the state needs to demonstrate that Marconi was aware he was committing a crime when sharing the documents.
Additionally, the defense is seeking to have voicemail evidence dismissed, claiming it was obtained improperly. The voicemail records allegedly came from Marconi’s new private cell phone account and should not be admissible since they were not listed in the initial search warrant.
Assistant Attorney General Joe Fincham countered, stating that any materials found on the device belong to the state, thus negating Marconi’s claim of privacy.
Wider Implications
The controversy has ensnared other prominent figures, including Marconi’s wife, Associate Supreme Court Justice Anna Barbara Hantz-Marconi, who faces scrutiny for allegedly seeking intervention from former Governor Chris Sununu on her husband’s behalf. Hantz-Marconi maintains that her discussions with Sununu were not criminal and were merely expressive of her frustrations regarding the implications on her work.
Sununu affirmed this viewpoint during an interview, indicating that Hantz-Marconi expressed concerns rather than making any requests, stating, “I didn’t get the sense that anything was illegal about the conversation."
Judicial Fallout
The case’s implications extend to New Hampshire’s judiciary, with Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald likely serving as a witness. As a precaution, the remaining four members of the state Supreme Court have recused themselves from the proceedings, reflecting the gravity of the situation.
Further court rulings on the motions filed are still pending, and as this story unfolds, the consequences for public officials involved could reshape the dynamics of New Hampshire’s judicial and political landscape.
Focuses on crime, public safety, and regional events.
Bio: Marcus is a community-based journalist passionate about reporting impactful stories that matter most to readers.